Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Contraception. 2016 Oct;94(4):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

Advancing non-directive pregnancy options counseling skills: A pilot Study on the use of blended learning with an online module and simulation.

Author information

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, 11200, SW 8th Street, Miami, FL, USA; Office of Medical Education, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, 11200, SW 8th Street, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: clupi@fiu.edu.
2
Department of Medical and Population Health Sciences Research, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, 11200, SW 8th Street, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, 11200, SW 8th Street, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: mward@fiu.edu.
3
Office of Medical Education, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, 11200, SW 8th Street, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: wchang@fiu.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Limitations on didactic time pose barriers to teaching non-directive pregnancy options counseling. This study set out to explore the use of an online module to support trainee performance in a pregnancy options counseling standardized-patient exercise implemented among third-year medical students, and to examine the effect of clinical experience on student performance.

STUDY DESIGN:

An online module was developed. A convenience sample of forty-six student performances in a family medicine clerkship participated in a standardized patient exercise. Trained faculty rated performances. Students completed a self-assessment and provided feedback on the online module. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to analyze data. Three coders qualitatively examined narrative student comments.

RESULTS:

Thirty-four students passed, 11 achieved a minimal pass, and one failed. The mean global rating from faculty was 2.8 (pass). Students with prior clinical experience significantly outperformed those without on the global rating scale with mean scores of 3.1 compared to 2.7, respectively (p=.044). All students agreed that the online module helped prepare them for the exercise. Qualitative analysis of students' feedback on the module revealed strengths in content and pedagogy. In their self-assessments, all but two students referred to content explicitly conveyed in the module.

CONCLUSION:

All students agreed that an online module supported their performance of non-directive pregnancy options counseling skills. Prior clinical experience was associated with improved performance. This module, along with the simulated exercise, can be implemented as a blended learning exercise without additional faculty teaching effort in standardized patient resource centers.

IMPLICATIONS:

Students agreed that an online module facilitates simulated performance of non-directive pregnancy options counseling skills. Future work should compare the impact of this approach to others, and explore the additional training needed to maintain and build on initial learning.

KEYWORDS:

Communication skills; Objective structured clinical examination; Online module; Pregnancy options counseling; Undergraduate medical education; Women's health

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center