Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):166-87. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15064.

Pediatric Audiology in North America: Current Clinical Practice and How It Relates to the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline.

Author information

1
National Centre for Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
2
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
3
Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.
4
Salus University, Elkins Park, PA.
5
East Penn Hearing Center, Emmaus, PA.
6
Oticon A/S, Smørum, Denmark.
7
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There is broad consensus that screening and diagnosis of permanent hearing loss in children must be embedded within a comprehensive, evidence-based, family-centered intervention program. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for pediatric hearing assessment and hearing aid verification aim to reduce variability in practice and increase the use of effective evidence-based diagnostic and treatment options so that optimal outcomes may be achieved. To be of value, guidelines must be translated and implemented into practice and ongoing monitoring of their use in practice should occur.

PURPOSE:

This paper provides the results of two studies that aim to examine current pediatric audiology and amplification practice in North America.

RESEARCH DESIGN:

A concurrent embedded mixed methods design was used.

STUDY SAMPLE:

An electronic survey was distributed to North American audiologists who delivered pediatric audiology services with 350 audiologists participating in study 1 and 63 audiologists participating in study 2.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

A quantitative approach was the predominant method of data collection. Respondents were prompted to provide additional qualitative text and detail regarding their quantitative response choice. This qualitative text was used during the analysis phase and combined with quantitative results to assist understanding of respondents' knowledge, skills, and barriers/facilitators to implement best practice in pediatric amplification.

RESULTS:

Approximately 70% of audiologists reported using best-practice protocols for pediatric hearing aid fitting. Despite widespread knowledge and increased use of CPGs over the last 18 yrs, results of these studies show that variation in practice patterns continue to exist. Several examples of implementation challenges are discussed with recommendations provided.

CONCLUSIONS:

In order for audiologists working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing and their families to achieve the principles of family-centered early intervention, practice guidelines must continue to be developed, disseminated, and translated as they have a positive impact on the services provided. Researchers and clinical audiologists who deliver services must continue to collaborate to understand the "how" and "why" of implementing guidelines into practice and to identify the barriers/facilitators encountered in trying to do so.

PMID:
26967360
DOI:
10.3766/jaaa.15064
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center