Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(6):390-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000039.

IMPORTANCE OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA FOR PRIORITY SETTING OF HIV/AIDS INTERVENTIONS.

Author information

1
Radboud Institute of Health Sciences,Radboud University Medical CenterNoor.Tromp@radboudumc.nl.
2
TB-HIV Research Center,Faculty of Medicine,Padjadjaran University.
3
Faculty of Economics and Business,Padjadjaran University.
4
Department of Public Health,Faculty of Medicine,Padjadjaran University.
5
Radboud Institute of Health Sciences,Radboud University Medical Center.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study describes the views of various stakeholders on the importance of different criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Indonesia.

METHODS:

Based on a general list of criteria and a focus group discussion with stakeholders (n = 6), a list was developed of thirty-two criteria that play a role in priority setting in HIV/AIDS control in West-Java province. Criteria were categorized according to the World Health Organization's health system goals and building block frameworks. People living with HIV/AIDS (n = 49), healthcare workers (HCW) (n = 41), the general population (n = 43), and policy makers (n = 22) rated the importance of thirty-two criteria on a 5-point Likert-scale. Thereafter, respondents ranked the highest rated criteria to express more detailed preferences.

RESULTS:

Stakeholders valued the following criteria as most important for the priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions: an intervention's impact on the HIV/AIDS epidemic, reduction of stigma, quality of care, effectiveness on individual level, and feasibility in terms of current capacity of the health system (i.e., HCW, product, information, and service requirements), financial sustainability, and acceptance by donors. Overall, stakeholders' preferences for the importance of criteria are similar.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study design outlines an approach for other settings to identify which criteria are important for priority setting of health interventions. For Indonesia, these study results may be used in priority setting processes for HIV/AIDS control and may contribute to more transparent and systematic allocation of resources.

KEYWORDS:

HIV/AIDS; Indonesia; Multi criteria decision making; Priority setting

PMID:
26961721
PMCID:
PMC4824960
DOI:
10.1017/S0266462316000039
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center