Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.173780.

Comparative effectiveness research and its utility in In-clinic practice.

Author information

1
Founder and CEO, MarksMan Healthcare Solutions, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
2
Department of Pharmacology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Abstract

One of the important components of patient-centered healthcare is comparative effectiveness research (CER), which aims at generating evidence from the real-life setting. The primary purpose of CER is to provide comparative information to the healthcare providers, patients, and policy makers about the standard of care available. This involves research on clinical questions unanswered by the explanatory trials during the regulatory approval process. Main methods of CER involve randomized controlled trials and observational methods. The limitations of these two methods have been overcome with the help of new statistical methods. After the evidence generation, it is equally important to communicate the results to all the interested organizations. CER is beginning to have its impact in the clinical practice as its results become part of the clinical practice guidelines. CER will have far-reaching scientific and financial impact. CER will make both the treating physician and the patient equally responsible for the treatment offered.

KEYWORDS:

Comparative effectiveness research; observational studies; randomized controlled trials

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Medknow Publications and Media Pvt Ltd Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center