Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Urology. 2016 May;91:143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.089. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

Gleason Misclassification Rate Is Independent of Number of Biopsy Cores in Systematic Biopsy.

Author information

1
Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
2
Department of Pathology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
3
Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
4
Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
5
Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: hye@bidmc.harvard.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the utility of saturation core biopsy and 12-core biopsy in detecting true Gleason grades, using final pathology in prostatectomy specimens as outcome measures, with a particular interest in Gleason upgrading.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

We compared the concordance rates of Gleason grades diagnosed on biopsies and prostatectomy specimens in 375 consecutive patients, including 106 saturation biopsies (18-33 cores, median = 20 cores) and 269 12-core biopsies. Grading bias was addressed by a central rereview of all cases that had discordance in reporting high Gleason grades (Gleason grade ≥ 4) on biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.

RESULTS:

For patients with high Gleason grades on final pathology, saturation and 12-core biopsy schemes had a comparable sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values (72.5% vs 69.5%, 91.9% vs 97.6%, 64.2% vs 58.4%, and 94.3% vs 98.5%, respectively) in detecting high Gleason grades. On multivariate analysis, prebiopsy serum prostate-specific antigen and clinical T stage independently predicted Gleason upgrading; saturation biopsy was not a significant predictor. Approximately one-third of cases where high Gleason grade was not present in the biopsy were attributed to the confinement of high-grade tumors to unusual anatomic locations such as anterior lobes, apex, bladder neck, and parasagittal zones.

CONCLUSION:

Our study showed that Gleason misclassification rate is independent of the number of biopsy cores in systematic biopsy. One of the reasons for missing high Gleason grade tumors on systematic biopsy was unusual tumor location outside of the biopsy grid, supporting the need for improved detection technique such as magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted biopsies.

PMID:
26944351
PMCID:
PMC5836472
DOI:
10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.089
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center