Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Malar J. 2016 Mar 1;15:132. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1191-z.

Reactive case-detection of malaria in Pailin Province, Western Cambodia: lessons from a year-long evaluation in a pre-elimination setting.

Author information

1
Malaria Consortium Cambodia, Phnom Penh Office, House #91, St. 95, Boeung Trabek, Chamcar Morn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. j.hustedt@malariaconsortium.org.
2
Malaria Consortium Cambodia, Phnom Penh Office, House #91, St. 95, Boeung Trabek, Chamcar Morn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. s.canavatidelatorre@kellogg.oxon.org.
3
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Ratchawithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. s.canavatidelatorre@kellogg.oxon.org.
4
Malaria Consortium Cambodia, 113 (6th floor of Parkway Square), Mao Tse Toung Blvd. Chamcar Morn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. c.rang@malariaconsortium.org.
5
Malaria Consortium Cambodia, Phnom Penh Office, House #91, St. 95, Boeung Trabek, Chamcar Morn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. rashton@tulane.edu.
6
Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, 5, Blvd Monivong, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. knimol@pasteur-kh.org.
7
Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, 5, Blvd Monivong, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. lberne@pasteur-kh.org.
8
Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, 5, Blvd Monivong, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. ksaorin@pasteur-kh.org.
9
The National Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Corner street 92, Trapaing Svay village, Sankat Phnom Penh Thmey, Khan Sensok, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. sivsovannaroths@gmail.com.
10
The National Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Corner street 92, Trapaing Svay village, Sankat Phnom Penh Thmey, Khan Sensok, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. polyteng168@gmail.com.
11
Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, 5, Blvd Monivong, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. dmenard@pasteur-kh.org.
12
Malaria Consortium Cambodia, Phnom Penh Office, House #91, St. 95, Boeung Trabek, Chamcar Morn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. jonathan.cox@lshtm.ac.uk.
13
Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. jonathan.cox@lshtm.ac.uk.
14
Malaria Consortium, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London, EC2A 4LT, UK. s.meek@malariaconsortium.org.
15
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Malaria Consortium Asia, Mahidol University, Room 805, 420/6 Rajavidhi Road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. a.roca@malariaconsortium.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

As momentum towards malaria elimination grows, strategies are being developed for scale-up in elimination settings. One prominent strategy, reactive case detection (RACD), involves screening and treating individuals living in close proximity to passively detected, or "index" cases. This study aims to use RACD to quantify Plasmodium parasitaemia in households of index cases, and identify risk factors for infection; these data could inform reactive screening approaches and identify target risk groups.

METHODS:

This study was conducted in the Western Cambodian province of Pailin between May 2013 and March 2014 among 440 households. Index participants/index cases (n = 270) and surrounding households (n = 110) were screened for Plasmodium infection with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT), microscopy and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Participants were interviewed to identify risk factors. A comparison group of 60 randomly-selected households was also screened, to compare infection levels of RACD and non-RACD households. In order to identify potential risk factors that would inform screening approaches and identify risk groups, multivariate logistic regression models were applied.

RESULTS:

Nine infections were identified in households of index cases (RACD approach) through RDT screening of 1898 individuals (seven Plasmodium vivax, two Plasmodium falciparum); seven were afebrile. Seventeen infections were identified through PCR screening of 1596 individuals (15 P. vivax, and 22 % P. falciparum/P. vivax mixed infections). In the control group, 25 P. falciparum infections were identified through PCR screening of 237 individuals, and no P. vivax was found. Plasmodium falciparum infection was associated with fever (p = 0.013), being a member of a control household (p ≤ 0.001), having a history of malaria infection (p = 0.041), and sleeping without a mosquito net (p = 0.011). Significant predictors of P. vivax infection, as diagnosed by PCR, were fever (p = 0.058, borderline significant) and history of malaria infection (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

This study found that RACD identified very few secondary infections when targeting index and neighbouring households for screening. The results suggest RACD is not appropriate, where exposure to malaria occurs away from the community, and there is a high level of treatment-seeking from the private sector. Piloting RACD in a range of transmission settings would help to identify the ideal environment for feasible and effective reactive screening methods.

PMID:
26931488
PMCID:
PMC4774174
DOI:
10.1186/s12936-016-1191-z
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center