Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Angiology. 2016 May;67(5):420-6. doi: 10.1177/0003319716631266. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

Critical Issues That Need to Be Addressed to Improve Outcomes for Patients With Carotid Stenosis.

Author information

1
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Neurology Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Faculty Advocating Collaborative and Thoughtful Carotid Artery Treatments (FACTCATS), FACTCATS.org Anne.L.Abbott@gmail.com.

Abstract

Significant improvement in outcomes for patients with carotid stenosis requires liberation from the historic fixation with randomization and a procedurally based, late-stage, reactive approach to medical care. We require a multipronged and multidisciplinary approach that includes all of the following: (i) removal of overreliance on, and biased use of, randomized trial data; (ii) using accurate ways to rank evidence quality and relevance; (iii) improved research reporting standards; (iv) building quality assurance and other research capability into routine practice; (v) producing evidence-true rather than evidence-based guidelines; (vi) bringing current optimal medical treatment to the community and measuring its effectiveness; (vii) funding only interventions known to help patients when and where they are treated and use the savings to fund vital research, including quality assurance in routine practice; and (viii) recognize that making the indication for carotid procedures obsolete is a good thing.

KEYWORDS:

carotid angioplasty/stenting; carotid endarterectomy; carotid stenosis; guidelines; quality assurance; stroke prevention

PMID:
26922085
DOI:
10.1177/0003319716631266
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center