Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb 24;16:146. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2197-1.

RNA disruption is associated with response to multiple classes of chemotherapy drugs in tumor cell lines.

Author information

1
Department of Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
2
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
3
Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
4
RNA Diagnostics Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
5
Division of Medical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
6
Faculty of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
7
Department of Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada. clanner@nosm.ca.
8
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada. clanner@nosm.ca.
9
Division of Medical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada. clanner@nosm.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Cellular stressors and apoptosis-inducing agents have been shown to induce ribosomal RNA (rRNA) degradation in eukaryotic cells. Recently, RNA degradation in vivo was observed in patients with locally advanced breast cancer, where mid-treatment tumor RNA degradation was associated with complete tumor destruction and enhanced patient survival. However, it is not clear how widespread chemotherapy induced "RNA disruption" is, the extent to which it is associated with drug response or what the underlying mechanisms are.

METHODS:

Ovarian (A2780, CaOV3) and breast (MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, BT474, SKBR3) cancer cell lines were treated with several cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs and total RNA was isolated. RNA was also prepared from docetaxel resistant A2780DXL and carboplatin resistant A2780CBN cells following drug exposure. Disruption of RNA was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis. Northern blotting was performed using probes complementary to the 28S and 18S rRNA to determine the origins of degradation bands. Apoptosis activation was assessed by flow cytometric monitoring of annexin-V and propidium iodide (PI) binding to cells and by measuring caspase-3 activation. The link between apoptosis and RNA degradation (disruption) was investigated using a caspase-3 inhibitor.

RESULTS:

All chemotherapy drugs tested were capable of inducing similar RNA disruption patterns. Docetaxel treatment of the resistant A2780DXL cells and carboplatin treatment of the A2780CBN cells did not result in RNA disruption. Northern blotting indicated that two RNA disruption bands were derived from the 3'-end of the 28S rRNA. Annexin-V and PI staining of docetaxel treated cells, along with assessment of caspase-3 activation, showed concurrent initiation of apoptosis and RNA disruption, while inhibition of caspase-3 activity significantly reduced RNA disruption.

CONCLUSIONS:

Supporting the in vivo evidence, our results demonstrate that RNA disruption is induced by multiple chemotherapy agents in cell lines from different tissues and is associated with drug response. Although present, the link between apoptosis and RNA disruption is not completely understood. Evaluation of RNA disruption is thus proposed as a novel and effective biomarker to assess response to chemotherapy drugs in vitro and in vivo.

PMID:
26911141
PMCID:
PMC4765116
DOI:
10.1186/s12885-016-2197-1
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center