Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;62(9):1100-1110. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw051. Epub 2016 Feb 7.

Protective Effect of Contemporary Pertussis Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Global Health.
2
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University.
3
Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine.
4
Emory Vaccine Center.
5
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta.
6
The Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Acellular pertussis (aP) and whole-cell (wP) pertussis vaccines are presumed to have similar short-term (<3 years after completion of the primary series) efficacy. However, vaccine effect varies between individual pertussis vaccine formulations, and many originally studied formulations are now unavailable. An updated analysis of the short-term protective effect of pertussis vaccines limited to formulations currently on the market in developed countries is needed.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies that evaluated pertussis vaccine efficacy or effectiveness within 3 years after completion (>3 doses) of a primary series of a currently available aP or wP vaccine formulation. The primary outcome was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical case definitions for pertussis. Study quality was assessed using the approach developed by the Child Health Epidemiology Research Group. We determined overall effect sizes using random-effects meta-analyses, stratified by vaccine (aP or wP) and study (efficacy or effectiveness) type.

RESULTS:

Meta-analysis of 2 aP vaccine efficacy studies (assessing the 3-component GlaxoSmithKline and 5-component Sanofi-Pasteur formulations) yielded an overall aP vaccine efficacy of 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81%-87%). Meta-analysis of 3 wP vaccine effectiveness studies (assessing the Behringwerke, Pasteur/Mérieux, and SmithKline Beecham formulations) yielded an overall wP vaccine effectiveness of 94% (95% CI, 88%-97%) (bothI(2)= 0%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although all contemporary aP and wP formulations protect against pertussis disease, in this meta-analysis the point estimate for short-term protective effect against WHO-defined pertussis in young children was lower for currently available aP vaccines than wP vaccines.

KEYWORDS:

acellular; meta-analysis; pertussis; vaccine efficacy/effectiveness; whole-cell

PMID:
26908803
PMCID:
PMC4826451
DOI:
10.1093/cid/ciw051
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center