Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Aug;175(2):263-72. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14475. Epub 2016 May 2.

Development of core outcome sets in hidradenitis suppurativa: systematic review of outcome measure instruments to inform the process.

Author information

1
Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, Wales, U.K.
2
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, Wales, U.K.

Abstract

The recent hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) Cochrane review identified outcome measure heterogeneity as an important issue to address when designing future HS trials. Our objective was to follow the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap, by performing a systematic review of HS outcome measure instruments to inform the development of an HS core outcome set. We performed a systematic review to identify validation evidence for outcome measure instruments used in HS randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and assessed the methodological quality of all HS outcome measure validity studies using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The 12 RCTs included in the Cochrane review utilized 30 outcome measure instruments, including 16 physician-reported instruments, 11 patient-reported instruments and three composite measures containing elements of both. Twenty-seven (90%) of the instruments lacked any validation data. Two further instruments have been developed and partially validated. Of the seven studies meeting our inclusion criteria, six were of 'fair' or 'poor' methodological quality, in part because most of the studies were not primarily designed for instrument validation. The HiSCR instrument is supported by good-quality validation data, but there are gaps, including assessment of internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and minimal clinically important difference, and convergent validity fell below the acceptable range for some comparisons. Multiple, usually unvalidated, outcome measure instruments have been used in HS RCTs. Where validation evidence is available there are issues of low methodological quality or incomplete validity assessment and so, currently, no instruments can be fully recommended.

PMID:
26873867
DOI:
10.1111/bjd.14475
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center