Format

Send to

Choose Destination
ISME J. 2016 Sep;10(9):2269-79. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.10. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

Protistan community analysis: key findings of a large-scale molecular sampling.

Author information

1
Biodiversity Department, Centre for Water and Environmental Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
2
Department of Bioinformatics, Straubing Centre of Science, Straubing, Germany.
3
Environment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK.
4
Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK.
5
Eawag and Institute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
6
Division of Genetics & Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
7
Bioinformatics Department and Centre for Water and Environmental Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
8
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), The Nothe, Weymouth, Dorset, UK.

Abstract

Protists are perhaps the most lineage-rich of microbial lifeforms, but remain largely unknown. High-throughput sequencing technologies provide opportunities to screen whole habitats in depth and enable detailed comparisons of different habitats to measure, compare and map protistan diversity. Such comparisons are often limited by low sample numbers within single studies and a lack of standardisation between studies. Here, we analysed 232 samples from 10 sampling campaigns using a standardised PCR protocol and bioinformatics pipeline. We show that protistan community patterns are highly consistent within habitat types and geographic regions, provided that sample processing is standardised. Community profiles are only weakly affected by fluctuations of the abundances of the most abundant taxa and, therefore, provide a sound basis for habitat comparison beyond random short-term fluctuations in the community composition. Further, we provide evidence that distribution patterns are not solely resulting from random processes. Distinct habitat types and distinct taxonomic groups are dominated by taxa with distinct distribution patterns that reflect their ecology with respect to dispersal and habitat colonisation. However, there is no systematic shift of the distribution pattern with taxon abundance.

PMID:
26859769
PMCID:
PMC4989302
DOI:
10.1038/ismej.2016.10
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center