Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ultraschall Med. 2018 Feb;39(1):56-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107765. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Color Tissue Doppler to Analyze Fetal Cardiac Time Intervals: Normal Values and Influence of Sample Gate Size.

Author information

1
Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University of Bonn, Germany.
2
Department of Fetal Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine-Westphalia, Bad Oeynhausen, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
3
Division of Prenatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Justus- LiebigUniversity and UKGM, Giessen, Germany.
4
Toshiba Medical Systems Europe, Germany.
5
Department for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Germany.
6
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bürgerhospital, Frankfurt, Germany.

Abstract

in English, German

PURPOSE:

To assess the time intervals of the cardiac cycle in healthy fetuses in the second and third trimester using color tissue Doppler imaging (cTDI) and to evaluate the influence of different sizes of sample gates on time interval values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Time intervals were measured from the cTDI-derived Doppler waveform using a small and large region of interest (ROI) in healthy fetuses.

RESULTS:

40 fetuses were included. The median gestational age at examination was 26 + 1 (range: 20 + 5 - 34 + 5) weeks. The median frame rate was 116/s (100 - 161/s) and the median heart rate 143 (range: 125 - 158) beats per minute (bpm). Using small and large ROIs, the second trimester right ventricular (RV) mean isovolumetric contraction times (ICTs) were 39.8 and 41.4 ms (p = 0.17), the mean ejection times (ETs) were 170.2 and 164.6 ms (p < 0.001), the mean isovolumetric relaxation times (IRTs) were 52.8 and 55.3 ms (p = 0.08), respectively. The left ventricular (LV) mean ICTs were 36.2 and 39.4 ms (p = 0.05), the mean ETs were 167.4 and 164.5 ms (p = 0.013), the mean IRTs were 53.9 and 57.1 ms (p = 0.05), respectively. The third trimester RV mean ICTs were 50.7 and 50.4 ms (p = 0.75), the mean ETs were 172.3 and 181.4 ms (p = 0.49), the mean IRTs were 50.2 and 54.6 ms (p = 0.03); the LV mean ICTs were 45.1 and 46.2 ms (p = 0.35), the mean ETs were 175.2 vs. 172.9 ms (p = 0.29), the mean IRTs were 47.1 and 50.0 ms (p = 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Isovolumetric time intervals can be analyzed precisely and relatively independent of ROI size. In the near future, automatic time interval measurement using ultrasound systems will be feasible and the analysis of fetal myocardial function can become part of the clinical routine.

PMID:
26844710
DOI:
10.1055/s-0041-107765
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
Loading ...
Support Center