Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Virol. 2016 Mar;76:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

External quality assessment studies for laboratory performance of molecular and serological diagnosis of Chikungunya virus infection.

Author information

1
Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
2
WHO Collaborating Centre for Arbovirus and Haemorrhagic Fever Reference and Research, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
3
Centre national de référence des arbovirus, Errit-IRBA HIA Laveran, Marseille, France.
4
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
5
Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: niedrigm@rki.de.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Since the re-emergence of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) in Reunion in 2005 and the recent outbreak in the Caribbean islands with an expansion to the Americas the CHIK diagnostic became very important.

OBJECTIVES:

We evaluate the performance of laboratories regarding molecular and serological diagnostic of CHIK worldwide.

STUDY DESIGN:

A panel of 12 samples for molecular and 13 samples for serology were provided to 60 laboratories in 40 countries for evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of molecular and serology testing.

RESULTS:

The panel for molecular diagnostic testing was analysed by 56 laboratories returning 60 data sets of results whereas the 56 and 60 data sets were returned for IgG and IgM diagnostic from the participating laboratories. Twenty-three from 60 data sets performed optimal, 7 acceptable and 30 sets of results require improvement. From 50 data sets only one laboratory shows an optimal performance for IgM detection, followed by 9 data sets with acceptable and the rest need for improvement. From 46 IgG serology data sets 20 provide an optimal, 2 an acceptable and 24 require improvement performance. The evaluation of some of the diagnostic performances allows linking the quality of results to the in-house methods or commercial assays used.

CONCLUSION:

The external quality assurance for CHIK diagnostics provides a good overview on the laboratory performance regarding sensitivity and specificity for the molecular and serology diagnostic required for the quick and reliable analysis of suspected CHIK patients. Nearly half of the laboratories have to improve their diagnostic profile to achieve a better performance.

KEYWORDS:

CHIK; Chikungunya; Diagnosis; EQA; Molecular; Proficiency test; Quality control; Serology

PMID:
26828561
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcv.2016.01.008
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center