Effects of treatment-integrity failures on a response-cost procedure

J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Jun;49(2):308-28. doi: 10.1002/jaba.291. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

Abstract

Effects of incorrect or partial implementation (poor treatment integrity) on response cost are largely unknown. We evaluated reduced treatment integrity during response cost on rates of 2 concurrently available responses. College students earned points by clicking on either a black circle or a red circle on a computer screen. Experiment 1 compared 2 types of treatment-integrity failures (omission and commission errors) across 2 levels of integrity (20% and 50%). Compared to 100% integrity conditions, omission errors did not suppress responding to the same extent, and commission errors reduced target responding but also decreased rates of alternative behavior. Experiment 2 compared the effects of 20% and 50% omission errors within subjects. Implementation at 50% integrity adequately suppressed responding, but treatment effects were lost at 20% integrity. There may be a critical level at which response cost must be implemented to suppress responding, which has important implications for application.

Keywords: contrast; human operant; punishment; response cost; treatment integrity.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Attention / physiology*
  • Conditioning, Operant*
  • Extinction, Psychological*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Punishment
  • Reinforcement Schedule
  • Reinforcement, Psychology*
  • Young Adult