Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jan 15;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0281-3.

A scoping review on determinants of unmet need for family planning among women of reproductive age in low and middle income countries.

Author information

1
Institute of Public Health, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. joewully1@yahoo.com.
2
School of Business & Law, Department of Administration & Management Studies, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box UPW 36, Wa, Ghana. joewully1@yahoo.com.
3
Institute of Public Health, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. stephan.brenner@uni-heidelberg.de.
4
Institute of Public Health, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. albrecht.jahn@urz.uni-heidelberg.de.
5
Institute of Public Health, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. manuela.de.allegri@urz.uni-heidelberg.de.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Poor access and low contraceptive prevalence are common to many Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Unmet need for family planning (FP), defined as the proportion of women wishing to limit or postpone child birth, but not using contraception, has been central to reproductive health efforts for decades and still remains relevant for most policy makers and FP programs in LMICs. There is still a lag in contraceptive uptake across regions resulting in high unmet need due to various socioeconomic and cultural factors. In this mixed method scoping review we analyzed quantitative, qualitative and mixed method studies to summarize those factors influencing unmet need among women in LMICs.

METHODS:

We conducted our scoping review by employing mixed method approach. We included studies applying quantitative and qualitative methods retrieved from online data bases (PubMed, JSTOR, and Google Scholar). We also reviewed the indexes of journals specific to the field of reproductive health by using a set of keywords related to unmet contraception need, and non-contraception use in LMICs.

RESULTS:

We retrieved 283 articles and retained 34 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, 26 were quantitative studies and 8 qualitative studies. We found unmet need for FP to range between 20 % and 58% in most studies. Woman's age was negatively associated with total unmet need for FP, meaning as women get older the unmet need for FP decreases. The number of children was found to be a positively associated determinant for a woman's total unmet need. Also, woman's level of education was negatively associated--as a woman's education improves, her total unmet need decreases. Frequently reported reasons for non-contraception use were opposition from husband or husbands fear of infidelity, as well as woman's fear of side effects or other health concerns related to contraceptive methods.

CONCLUSION:

Factors associated with unmet need for FP and non-contraception use were common across different LMIC settings. This suggests that women in LMICs face similar barriers to FP and that it is still necessary for reproductive health programs to identify FP interventions that more specifically tackle unmet need.

PMID:
26772591
PMCID:
PMC4714507
DOI:
10.1186/s12905-015-0281-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center