Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Sep;170(1-4):82-5. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv521. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

EURADOS INTERCOMPARISONS IN EXTERNAL RADIATION DOSIMETRY: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES AMONG EXERCISES FOR WHOLE-BODY PHOTON, WHOLE-BODY NEUTRON, EXTREMITY, EYE-LENS AND PASSIVE AREA DOSEMETERS.

Author information

1
CIEMAT, Radiation Dosimetry, Madrid, Spain ana.romero@ciemat.es.
2
NRG, Individual Monitoring, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
3
Cavendish Nuclear Limited, Berkeley Approved Dosimetry Service, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, UK.
4
Seibersdorf Labor GmbH, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Seibersdorf, Austria.
5
ENEA, Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna, Italy.
6
Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
7
Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany.
8
Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany.

Abstract

The European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) has been organising dosimetry intercomparisons for many years in response to an identified requirement from individual monitoring services (IMS) for independent performance tests for dosimetry systems. The participation in intercomparisons gives IMS the opportunity to show compliance with their own quality management system, compare results with other participants and develop plans for improving their dosimetry systems. In response to growing demand, EURADOS has increased the number of intercomparisons for external radiation dosimetry. Most of these fit into the programme of self-financing intercomparisons for dosemeters routinely used by IMS. This programme is being coordinated by EURADOS working group 2 (WG2). Up to now, this programme has included four intercomparisons for whole-body dosemeters in photon fields, one for extremity dosemeters in photon and beta fields, and one for whole-body dosemeters in neutron fields. Other EURADOS working groups have organised additional intercomparisons including events in 2014 for eye-lens dosemeters and passive area dosemeters for environmental monitoring. In this paper, the organisation and achievements of these intercomparisons are compared in detail focusing on the similarities and differences in their execution.

PMID:
26759475
DOI:
10.1093/rpd/ncv521
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center