Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Actas Urol Esp. 2016 Apr;40(3):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 31.

Voiding urosonography with second-generation contrast as a main tool for examining the upper and lower urinary tract in children. Pilot Study.

[Article in English, Spanish]

Author information

1
Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca , Murcia, España. Electronic address: mfndezibieta@hotmail.com.
2
Servicio de Radiología, Hospital General Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, España.
3
Pediatría, Centro de Salud Madrigueras-Villamalea, Albacete, España.
4
Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital General Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, España.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

In this series, we analyse the diagnostic efficacy of serial voiding urosonography (VUS) with second-generation contrast, combined harmoniously and specifically with contrast technology, in the examination of the urinary tract in children. This examination includes the diagnosis and follow-up for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urethral disorders, mainly those of the posterior urethral valve (PUV).

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

After obtaining informed consent, a prospective study was conducted using urosonography with second-generation contrast (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles, SonoVue®) from November 2014 to October 2015 (1 year) in paediatric patients with suspected VUR or PUV impairment. For patients with a high suspicion of VUR and in cases of PUV, we also conducted simultaneous voiding cystourethrography (VCUG).

RESULTS:

We studied 40 patients (80 renal units) between the ages of 2 months and 13 years (median age, 14 months). The indication for the test was a suspected VUR (36 patients, group A) and PUV follow-up (4 patients, group B). The test was correlated with VCUG in 16 patients (12 cases with high suspicion of VUR in group A and with 4 cases of PUV in group B). The visualisation of the urethra was appropriate in cases of dilation or urethral stricture. For 3 of these patients with bilateral VUR demonstrated in the serial VUS, the VCUG showed only unilateral VUR in 2 of the patients and no VUR in 1 of the patients (κ=.73).

DISCUSSION:

We have shown that the visualisation of the urethra is no longer a limitation and that serial VUS can be superior to conventional VCUG in diagnosing VUR.

KEYWORDS:

Echocystography; Ecocistografía; Posterior urethral valves; Reflujo vesicoureteral; Urosonografía; Urosonography; Vesicoureteral reflux; Válvulas de uretra posterior

PMID:
26748842
DOI:
10.1016/j.acuro.2015.11.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center