Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;42(2):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

The assessment and management of older cancer patients: A SIOG surgical task force survey on surgeons' attitudes.

Author information

1
University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Department of Surgery, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: ghignone.bologna@gmail.com.
2
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
3
University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Department of Surgery, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
4
Roger Williams Medical Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, Affiliate of Boston University, 50 Maude Street, Providence, RI 02908, United States.
5
University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3DT, United Kingdom.
6
University of Liverpool, St. Helens Teaching Hospital, Department of Surgery, Marshalls Cross Road, St. Helens WA9 3DA, United Kingdom.

Abstract

AIM:

The Surgical Task Force at SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) designed this survey to explore the surgical oncologists' approach toward elderly cancer patients.

METHODS:

A web-based survey was sent to all members of ESSO (European Society of Surgical Oncology) and SSO (Society of Surgical Oncology).

RESULTS:

Two hundred and fifty-one surgeons responded (11% response rate) with a main interest on breast (62.1%), colorectal (43%) and hepatobiliary (27.4%) surgery. Almost all surgeons (>90%) offer surgery regardless the patient's age; only 48% consider mandatory a preoperative frailty assessment. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, nutritional and performance status are most frequently used as screening tools; only 6.4% surgeons use Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in daily practice and collaboration with geriatricians is low (36.3%). If proven to be effective, the majority of surgeons (71%) is prepared to pre-habilitate patients for up to 4 weeks before surgery. One in two surgeons would not offer an operation to patients with impaired cognitive status; conversely, one in three would proceed to surgery regardless of the patient's cognitive status, if functional capacity is conserved. Quality of life and functional recovery are regarded as the most important endpoints in onco-geriatric surgery. Large "real life" prospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials are demanded.

CONCLUSION:

Age is not perceived as a limitation to surgery. Screening for frailty is limited. A thorough CGA is seldom used and collaboration with geriatricians is rather uncommon. There is a need for clinical investigations focusing on pre-habilitation and other strategies to achieve better functional recovery.

KEYWORDS:

Frailty; Functional recovery; Geriatric assessment; Geriatric oncology; Surgery; Survey

PMID:
26718329
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center