Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Obes Rev. 2015 Dec;16 Suppl 2:127-37. doi: 10.1111/obr.12325.

Fat, sugar and water intakes among families from the IDEFICS intervention and control groups: first observations from I.Family.

Author information

1
Section for Epidemiology and Social Medicine (EPSO), Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2
Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
3
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
4
Department of Pediatrics, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
5
Research and Education Institute of Child Health, Strovolos, Cyprus.
6
GENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition, and Development) research group, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
7
Epidemiology & Population Genetics, Institute of Food Sciences, CNR, Avellino, Italy.
8
Research Centre, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.
9
Department of Public Health, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this paper is to investigate differences in diets of families in intervention versus control communities 5 years after the Identification and Prevention of Dietary- and Lifestyle-Induced Health Effects in Children and Infants intervention ended.

METHODS:

Altogether, 4,691 families from the I.Family study with at least one participating parent and one child are included in this analysis. Diet quality indicators, defined as propensities to consume fat, sugar, water and fruit and vegetables, are calculated from a 59-item food frequency questionnaire. Multilevel linear models with random intercepts for study centre are used to determine whether mean diet indicators, calculated at the family level, differed as a function of previous exposure to the intervention.

RESULTS:

Families in the intervention communities reported a significantly lower sugar propensity (19.8% vs. 20.7% of total food items, p < 0.01) and a higher water propensity (47.3% vs. 46.0% of total beverages, p < 0.05) compared with families in the control communities, while fat and fruit and vegetables propensities were similar. No significant diet differences between intervention and control children were present at the Identification and Prevention of Dietary- and Lifestyle-Induced Health Effects in Children and Infants baseline.

DISCUSSION:

This result indicates better diet quality in intervention families, which was not present in children when their diets were assessed before the intervention, and gives some cause for optimism regarding the sustainability of some aspects of the diet intervention.

KEYWORDS:

Diet intervention; I.Family study; IDEFICS study; family diet

PMID:
26707022
DOI:
10.1111/obr.12325
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center