Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Addiction. 2016 Jan;111(1):167-75. doi: 10.1111/add.13057.

Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing internet gaming disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al. (2014).

Author information

1
Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
2
iMinds-MICT-Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
3
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
4
University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
5
Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
6
University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
7
Mainz University, Mainz, Germany.
8
Johns Hopkins University, Baltomore, MD, USA.
9
University of California Berkeley, CA, USA.
10
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
11
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
12
Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium.
13
University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
14
University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
15
Universidad Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
16
Stetson University, DeLand, FL, USA.
17
Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
18
McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
19
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
20
Middlesex University, Hendon, UK.
21
University of Derby, Derby, UK.

KEYWORDS:

Gaming addiction; IGD assessment; gaming addiction assessment; internet gaming disorder; problematic gaming; video game addiction

PMID:
26669530
PMCID:
PMC5699464
DOI:
10.1111/add.13057
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center