Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Food Nutr Res. 2015 Dec 10;59:28613. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v59.28613. eCollection 2015.

Comparison of growth and nutritional status in infants receiving goat milk-based formula and cow milk-based formula: a randomized, double-blind study.

Xu M1,2, Wang Y1,2, Dai Z3, Zhang Y3, Li Y1,2, Wang J1,4.

Author information

1
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Toxicological Research and Risk Assessment for Food Safety, Peking University, Beijing, China.
3
Ausnutria Hyproca Dairy Group BV, Changsha, China.
4
Beijing Key Laboratory of Toxicological Research and Risk Assessment for Food Safety, Peking University, Beijing, China; bmuwjbxy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the growth and nutritional status of infants fed goat milk-based formula (GMF) and cow milk-based formula (CMF).

METHODS:

The study was conducted in Beijing, China. It was a double-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 79 infants aged 0-3 months old were recruited and randomized in GMF or CMF group. The infants were fed the allocated formula to 6 months. The weight, length, and head circumference were measured at the enrolment, 3 and 6 months. The start time and types of solid food were recorded. Blood elements, urinal, and fecal parameters were also tested.

RESULTS:

The average weight of infants in the GMF group (mean±SD) was 4.67±0.99 kg and in the CMF group 4.73±1.10 kg at enrolment, and 8.75±0.98 kg (GMF) and 8.92±0.88 kg (CMF) at 6 months. There were no differences in the adjusted intention-to-treat analyses of weight, length, head circumference, and BMI z-scores between the two formula-fed groups over the 6-month study. Similarly, there were no remarkable differences in the timing and types of solid food, blood elements, urinal, and feces parameters, between the GMF and CMF group. No group differences have been shown in bowel motion consistency, duration of crying, ease of settling, or frequency of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS:

GMF-provided growth and nutritional outcomes did not differ from those provided by CMF.

KEYWORDS:

formula; goat milk; growth; infant; nutritional status

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Swedish Nutrition Foundation Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center