Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Jan;39:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 27.

A single bout of meditation biases cognitive control but not attentional focusing: Evidence from the global-local task.

Author information

1
Institute for Psychological Research, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: colzato@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
2
Institute for Psychological Research, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Recent studies show that a single bout of meditation can impact information processing. We were interested to see whether this impact extends to attentional focusing and the top-down control over irrelevant information. Healthy adults underwent brief single bouts of either focused attention meditation (FAM), which is assumed to increase top-down control, or open monitoring meditation (OMM), which is assumed to weaken top-down control, before performing a global-local task. While the size of the global-precedence effect (reflecting attentional focusing) was unaffected by type of meditation, the congruency effect (indicating the failure to suppress task-irrelevant information) was considerably larger after OMM than after FAM. Our findings suggest that engaging in particular kinds of meditation creates particular cognitive-control states that bias the individual processing style toward either goal-persistence or cognitive flexibility.

KEYWORDS:

Congruency effect; Focused attention meditation (FAM); Global precedence; Open monitoring meditation (OMM)

PMID:
26637968
DOI:
10.1016/j.concog.2015.11.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center