Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Front Public Health. 2015 Nov 20;3:257. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00257. eCollection 2015.

User Feedback on the MSF Tele-Expertise Service After a 4-Year Pilot Trial - A Comprehensive Analysis.

Author information

1
Fondation Médecins Sans Frontières , Paris , France ; EA4569, Department of Medical Ethics and Legal Medicine, Paris Descartes University , Paris , France.
2
University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK.
3
Médecins Sans Frontières , Geneva , Switzerland ; McGill University , Montréal, QC , Canada.
4
Internal Medicine Department, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP , Paris , France ; Faculty of Medicine, Sorbonne Universités, University Pierre et Marie Curie , Paris , France ; U1142, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénieurie des Connaissances en e-Santé (LIMICS), INSERM, Université Paris , Paris , France.
5
Crash, Fondation Médecins Sans Frontières , Paris , France.
6
EA4569, Department of Medical Ethics and Legal Medicine, Paris Descartes University , Paris , France.
7
Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway , Tromsø , Norway ; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø , Tromsø , Norway.

Abstract

We surveyed all users of the Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) tele-expertise service, approximately four years after it began operation. The survey contained 50 questions and was sent to 294 referrers and 254 specialists. There were 163 responses (response rate 30%). There were no significant differences between the responses from French and English users, so the responses were combined for subsequent analysis. Most of the responders were doctors (133 of 157 who answered that question), and most had completed field missions for MSF, i.e., both specialists and referrers. The majority stated that the system was user friendly and that they found it self-explanatory (i.e., they did not need to be shown how to use it). Almost all the referrers found that the telemedicine advice that they received was helpful, changed diagnosis and management, and/or reassured the patient. Similar feedback came from the specialists, who also felt that there was educational value for the field doctor. Although there was general satisfaction with the service, the survey identified various problems. The main concerns of the referrers were the lack of promotion of the system at headquarters' level, and the main concerns of the specialists were the lack of feedback about patient follow-up. Nonetheless, both referrers and specialists recognized the benefits of telemedicine in improving patient management, providing education, and reducing isolation in the field.

KEYWORDS:

humanitarian; low-resource setting; tele-expertise; teleconsultation; telemedicine

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center