Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):529.e1-529.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.929. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

Pregnancy among US women: differences by presence, type, and complexity of disability.

Author information

1
Institute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. Electronic address: hornerjo@ohsu.edu.
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; National Institute of Public Health, Center for Health Systems Research, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
3
Institute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Approximately 12% of women of reproductive age have some type of disability. Very little is known about sexual and reproductive health issues among women with disabilities, including what proportion of women with disabilities experience pregnancy. Data on pregnancy are important to inform needs for preconception and pregnancy care for women with disabilities.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to describe the occurrence of pregnancy among women with various types of disability and with differing levels of disability complexity, compared with women without disabilities, in a nationally representative sample.

STUDY DESIGN:

We conducted cross-sectional analyses of 2008-2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey annualized data to estimate the proportion of women aged 18-44 years with and without disabilities who reported a pregnancy during 1 year of participation on the survey panel. We used a multivariable logistic regression to test the association of pregnancy with presence, type, and complexity of disability, controlling for other factors associated with pregnancy.

RESULTS:

Similar proportions of women with and without disabilities reported a pregnancy (10.8% vs 12.3%, with 95% confidence intervals overlapping). Women with the most complex disabilities (those that impact activities such as self-care and work) were less likely to have been pregnant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69, 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.93), but women whose disabilities affected only basic actions (seeing, hearing, movement, cognition) did not differ significantly from women with no disabilities.

CONCLUSION:

Women with a variety of types of disabilities experience pregnancy. Greater attention is needed to the reproductive health care needs of this population to ensure appropriate contraceptive, preconception, and perinatal care.

KEYWORDS:

people with disabilities; population-based data; pregnancy; women

PMID:
26546851
PMCID:
PMC4821180
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.929
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center