Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 6;16:372. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0808-5.

Practical impacts of genomic data "cleaning" on biological discovery using surrogate variable analysis.

Jaffe AE1,2, Hyde T3,4,5, Kleinman J6,7, Weinbergern DR8,9,10,11,12, Chenoweth JG13, McKay RD14, Leek JT15, Colantuoni C16,17,18.

Author information

1
Lieber Institute for Brain Development, 855 N Wolfe St, Ste 300, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. andrew.jaffe@libd.org.
2
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. andrew.jaffe@libd.org.
3
Lieber Institute for Brain Development, 855 N Wolfe St, Ste 300, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. Thomas.Hyde@libd.org.
4
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. Thomas.Hyde@libd.org.
5
Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimor, MD, 21205, USA. Thomas.Hyde@libd.org.
6
Lieber Institute for Brain Development, 855 N Wolfe St, Ste 300, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. Joel.Kleinman@libd.org.
7
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. Joel.Kleinman@libd.org.
8
Lieber Institute for Brain Development, 855 N Wolfe St, Ste 300, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. drweinberger@libd.org.
9
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. drweinberger@libd.org.
10
Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimor, MD, 21205, USA. drweinberger@libd.org.
11
Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA. drweinberger@libd.org.
12
McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA. drweinberger@libd.org.
13
Lieber Institute for Brain Development, 855 N Wolfe St, Ste 300, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. josh.chenoweth@libd.org.
14
Lieber Institute for Brain Development, 855 N Wolfe St, Ste 300, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. ronald.mckay@libd.org.
15
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. ljeek@jhsph.edu.
16
Lieber Institute for Brain Development, 855 N Wolfe St, Ste 300, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. carlo.colantuoni@libd.org.
17
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. carlo.colantuoni@libd.org.
18
Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA. carlo.colantuoni@libd.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Genomic data production is at its highest level and continues to increase, making available novel primary data and existing public data to researchers for exploration. Here we explore the consequences of "batch" correction for biological discovery in two publicly available expression datasets. We consider this to include the estimation of and adjustment for wide-spread systematic heterogeneity in genomic measurements that is unrelated to the effects under study, whether it be technical or biological in nature.

METHODS:

We present three illustrative data analyses using surrogate variable analysis (SVA) and describe how to perform artifact discovery in light of natural heterogeneity within biological groups, secondary biological questions of interest, and non-linear treatment effects in a dataset profiling differentiating pluripotent cells (GSE32923) and another from human brain tissue (GSE30272).

RESULTS:

Careful specification of biological effects of interest is very important to factor-based approaches like SVA. We demonstrate greatly sharpened global and gene-specific differential expression across treatment groups in stem cell systems. Similarly, we demonstrate how to preserve major non-linear effects of age across the lifespan in the brain dataset. However, the gains in precisely defining known effects of interest come at the cost of much other information in the "cleaned" data, including sex, common copy number effects and sample or cell line-specific molecular behavior.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our analyses indicate that data "cleaning" can be an important component of high-throughput genomic data analysis when interrogating explicitly defined effects in the context of data affected by robust technical artifacts. However, caution should be exercised to avoid removing biological signal of interest. It is also important to note that open data exploration is not possible after such supervised "cleaning", because effects beyond those stipulated by the researcher may have been removed. With the goal of making these statistical algorithms more powerful and transparent to researchers in the biological sciences, we provide exploratory plots and accompanying R code for identifying and guiding "cleaning" process (https://github.com/andrewejaffe/StemCellSVA). The impact of these methods is significant enough that we have made newly processed data available for the brain data set at http://braincloud.jhmi.edu/plots/ and GSE30272.

PMID:
26545828
PMCID:
PMC4636836
DOI:
10.1186/s12859-015-0808-5
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center