Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Headache Pain. 2015;16:92. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0577-6. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

Visual evoked potentials in subgroups of migraine with aura patients.

Author information

1
G.B. Bietti Foundation-IRCCS, Department of Neurophysiology of Vision and Neurophthalmology, Via Livenza 3, 00198, Rome, Italy. gianluca.coppola@gmail.com.
2
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy.
3
Fondazione Don Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
4
G.B. Bietti Foundation-IRCCS, Department of Neurophysiology of Vision and Neurophthalmology, Via Livenza 3, 00198, Rome, Italy.
5
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Dipartimento Tecnologie e Salute, Rome, Italy.
6
Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology-CHR Citadelle, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
7
IRCCS-Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Patients suffering from migraine with aura can have either pure visual auras or complex auras with sensory disturbances and dysphasia, or both. Few studies have searched for possible pathophysiological differences between these two subgroups of patients.

METHODS:

Methods - Forty-seven migraine with aura patients were subdivided in a subgroup with exclusively visual auras (MA, N = 27) and another with complex neurological auras (MA+, N = 20). We recorded pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP: 15 min of arc cheques, 3.1 reversal per second, 600 sweeps) and measured amplitude and habituation (slope of the linear regression line of amplitude changes from the 1st to 6th block of 100 sweeps) for the N1-P1 and P1-N2 components in patients and, for comparison, in 30 healthy volunteers (HV) of similar age and gender distribution.

RESULTS:

VEP N1-P1 habituation, i.e. amplitude decrement between 1st and 6th block, which was obvious in most HV (mean slope -0.50), was deficient in both MA (slope +0.01, p = 0.0001) and MA+ (-0.0049, p = 0.001) patients. However, VEP N1-P1 amplitudes across blocks were normal in MA patients, while they were significantly greater in MA+ patients than in HVs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings suggest that in migraine with aura patients different aura phenotypes may be underpinned by different pathophysiological mechanisms. Pre-activation cortical excitability could be higher in patients with complex neurological auras than in those having pure visual auras or in healthy volunteers.

KEYWORDS:

Complex aura; Cortical excitability; Habituation; Migraine with aura; Visual aura; Visual evoked potentials

PMID:
26527348
PMCID:
PMC4630240
DOI:
10.1186/s10194-015-0577-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center