Send to

Choose Destination
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):e25-e31. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000327.

Putting the Law Into Practice: A Comparison of Isolation and Quarantine As Tools to Control Tuberculosis and Ebola.

Author information

Center for Public Health Practice, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Ms Hershey); Champaign-Urbana Public Health District, Champaign, Illinois (Ms Pryde); Public Health Preparedness (Mr Mwaungulu) and Environmental Health, Pandemic Preparedness and Catastrophic Response (Mr Roszak), National Association of County & City Health Officials, Washington, District of Columbia; and Rollins Student Government Association, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Phifer).


The recent Ebola epidemic has put the words "isolation and quarantine" in the spotlight. Isolation and quarantine are tools that are often utilized by public health officials around the United States to address various types of infectious disease, including tuberculosis. While voluntary compliance is preferred, it can be difficult to achieve. In cases where an individual chooses not to voluntarily comply with an isolation or quarantine request, public health officials require assistance from the judiciary and law enforcement to effectuate the order. This article compares 2 recent court cases with different outcomes where public health officials sought assistance from the courts to enforce an isolation or quarantine order.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center