Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Resuscitation. 2016 Jan;98:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

Association of advanced airway device with chest compression fraction during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.

Author information

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
2
The Clinical Trials Center, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
3
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
4
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie, PA, USA.
5
Alfred Hospital and Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne Australia.
6
Sunnybrook Center for Prehospital Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Divison of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rescu, Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
7
Rescu, Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
8
Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
9
The Ottawa Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON, Canada.
10
Clackamas Fire District #1, Milwaukie, OR, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Select Emergency Medical Services (EMS) practitioners substitute endotracheal intubation (ETI) with supraglottic airway (SGA) insertion to minimize CPR chest compression interruptions, but the resulting effects upon chest compression fraction (CCF) are unknown. We sought to determine the differences in CCF between adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) receiving ETI and those receiving SGA.

METHODS:

We studied adult, non-traumatic OHCA patients enrolled in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Prehospital Resuscitation using an Impedance valve and an Early vs. Delayed analysis (PRIMED) trial. Chest compressions were measured using compression or thoracic impedance sensors. We limited the analysis to those receiving ETI or SGA (Combitube, King Laryngeal Tube, or Laryngeal Mask Airway) and >2min of chest compression data before and after airway insertion. We compared CCF between ETI and SGA before and after airway insertion, adjusting for age, sex, witnessed arrest, bystander CPR, shockable initial rhythm, public location, PRIMED trial arm, and regional ROC center. We also compared the change in CCF for each airway technique.

RESULTS:

Of 14,955 patients enrolled in the ROC PRIMED trial, we analyzed 2767 cases, including 2051 ETI, 671 SGA, and 45 both. Among subjects in this investigation the mean age was 66.4 years with a male predominace, 46% with witnessed event, 37% receiving bystander CPR, and 22% presenting with an initially shockable rhythm. Pre- and post-airway CCF was higher for SGA than ETI (SGA pre-airway CCF 73.2% [95%CI: 71.6-74.7%] vs. ETI 70.6% [95%CI: 69.7-71.5%]; post-airway 76.7% [95%CI: 75.2-78.1%] vs. 72.4% [95%CI: 71.5-73.3%]). After adjusting for potential confounders, these significant changes persisted (pre-airway difference 2.2% favoring SGA, p-value=0.046; post-airway 3.4% favoring SGA, p=0.001).

CONCLUSION:

In patients with OHCA, we detected a slightly higher rate of CCF in patients for whom a SGA was inserted, both before and after insertion. However, the actual differences were so small, that in the context of this observational, secondary analysis, it is unclear if this represents a clinically significant difference.

KEYWORDS:

CPR; Cardiac arrest; Emergency Medical Services; Endotracheal intubation; Supraglottic airway

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center