Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Jan;21(1):70-83. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12627. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Quality of antenatal and childbirth care in rural health facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania: an intervention study.

Author information

1
International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
2
Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso.
3
Navrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana.
4
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
5
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
6
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the impact of an intervention consisting of a computer-assisted clinical decision support system and performance-based incentives, aiming at improving quality of antenatal and childbirth care.

METHODS:

Intervention study in rural primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. In each country, six intervention and six non-intervention PHC facilities, located in one intervention and one non-intervention rural districts, were selected. Quality was assessed in each facility by health facility surveys, direct observation of antenatal and childbirth care, exit interviews, and reviews of patient records and maternal and child health registers. Findings of pre- and post-intervention and of intervention and non-intervention health facility quality assessments were analysed and assessed for significant (P < 0.05) quality of care differences.

RESULTS:

Post-intervention quality scores do not show a clear difference to pre-intervention scores and scores at non-intervention facilities. Only a few variables had a statistically significant better post-intervention quality score and when this is the case this is mostly observed in only one study-arm, being pre-/post-intervention or intervention/non-intervention. Post-intervention care shows similar deficiencies in quality of antenatal and childbirth care and in detection, prevention, and management of obstetric complications as at baseline and non-intervention study facilities.

CONCLUSION:

Our intervention study did not show a significant improvement in quality of care during the study period. However, the use of new technology seems acceptable and feasible in rural PHC facilities in resource-constrained settings, creating the opportunity to use this technology to improve quality of care.

KEYWORDS:

QUALMAT ; accouchement; calidad de cuidados; childbirth; health IT; maternal health; newborn health; parto; quality of care; qualité des soins; salud del neonato; salud materna; santé maternelle; santé néonatale; tecnologías de la información en salud

PMID:
26503485
DOI:
10.1111/tmi.12627
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center