Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1173-81. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3388. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

A comparison of genetically matched cell lines reveals the equivalence of human iPSCs and ESCs.

Author information

1
Department of Molecular Biology, Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
2
Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
3
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA.
4
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
5
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
6
Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
7
Center for Genome Research, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
8
Institute for Cell Engineering, Department of Neurology, The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
9
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Abstract

The equivalence of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) remains controversial. Here we use genetically matched hESC and hiPSC lines to assess the contribution of cellular origin (hESC vs. hiPSC), the Sendai virus (SeV) reprogramming method and genetic background to transcriptional and DNA methylation patterns while controlling for cell line clonality and sex. We find that transcriptional and epigenetic variation originating from genetic background dominates over variation due to cellular origin or SeV infection. Moreover, the 49 differentially expressed genes we detect between genetically matched hESCs and hiPSCs neither predict functional outcome nor distinguish an independently derived, larger set of unmatched hESC and hiPSC lines. We conclude that hESCs and hiPSCs are molecularly and functionally equivalent and cannot be distinguished by a consistent gene expression signature. Our data further imply that genetic background variation is a major confounding factor for transcriptional and epigenetic comparisons of pluripotent cell lines, explaining some of the previously observed differences between genetically unmatched hESCs and hiPSCs.

PMID:
26501951
PMCID:
PMC4847940
DOI:
10.1038/nbt.3388
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center