Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 20;13:273. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0511-4.

De-adoption and its 43 related terms: harmonizing low-value care terminology.

Author information

1
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. danijela.gnjidic@sydney.edu.au.
2
Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. elshaug@sydney.edu.au.
3
Lown Institute, Brookline, MA, USA. elshaug@sydney.edu.au.

Abstract

Research into the prevalence and impact of low-value medical practices has evolved substantially over the past two decades. However, despite international efforts, many challenges still remain with regards to progress in this field, including limits in the capacity to identify and prioritize low-value care practices and to systematically appraise clinical and policy attempts at redressing low-value care. A recent article by Niven et al. in BMC Medicine consolidates the current literature and terminology on the de-adoption of clinical practices, advocating the use of de-adoption as an appropriate term to label low-value care and proposes a new synthesis model to facilitate efforts to reverse ineffective and harmful medical practices. We hope that this work will facilitate advances in low-value care research and policy, and shift focus towards establishing evidence for de-adopting low-value interventions, which is crucial since attempts to reduce low-value care interventions have shown mixed results. Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/255.

PMID:
26486727
PMCID:
PMC4617953
DOI:
10.1186/s12916-015-0511-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center