Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):435-43. doi: 10.1177/1556264615610209. Epub 2015 Oct 19.

Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent in a Randomized Controlled Trial for Chronic Knee Pain.

Author information

1
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia m.guillemin@unimelb.edu.au.
2
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

Abstract

This study explored participants' experiences of randomized controlled trial (RCT) participation to examine their understanding of the trial design and whether their consent was indeed informed. A nested qualitative interview study was conducted with 38 participants from a sample of 282 who participated in a complex RCT evaluating the effectiveness of laser compared with needle acupuncture for chronic knee pain. Overall participants had a good understanding of the RCT, and concepts such as randomization and placebo. Their experiences of being in the trial were largely positive, even if they did not experience any knee pain improvement. Their responses to unblinding at the end of the study were accepting. Participants had a good functional understanding of the RCT, sufficient for valid informed consent.

KEYWORDS:

RCT; informed consent; participants’ experience; participants’ understanding

PMID:
26483427
DOI:
10.1177/1556264615610209
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center