Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 19;12(10):e1001889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889. eCollection 2015 Oct.

Effect of health risk assessment and counselling on health behaviour and survival in older people: a pragmatic randomised trial.

Author information

1
Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
2
Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
3
Institute of Primary Care, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
4
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
5
Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
6
Department of Ageing and Health, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
7
Clinical Age Research Unit, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
8
University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Langley Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Langley Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival.

METHODS AND FINDINGS:

This study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean ± standard deviation of 6.9 ± 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 ± 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014.

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN 28458424.

PMID:
26479077
PMCID:
PMC4610679
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center