Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Sep;24(3):68-70. doi: 10.1177/1757975915602632. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

The public health response to 'do-it-yourself' urbanism.

Author information

1
1. Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
2
2. School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
3
3. Vancouver Island Health Authority, Victoria, BC, Canada.
4
4 School of Public Administration, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
5
5. Human Environments Analysis Lab, Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
6
8. Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Greater understanding of the important and complex relationship between the built environment and human health has made 'healthy places' a focus of public health and health promotion. While current literature concentrates on creating healthy places through traditional decision-making pathways (namely, municipal land use planning and urban design processes), this paper explores do-it-yourself (DIY) urbanism: a movement circumventing traditional pathways to, arguably, create healthy places and advance social justice. Despite being aligned with several health promotion goals, DIY urbanism interventions are typically illegal and have been categorized as a type of civil disobedience. This is challenging for public health officials who may value DIY urbanism outcomes, but do not necessarily support the means by which it is achieved. Based on the literature, we present a preliminary approach to health promotion decision-making in this area. Public health officials can voice support for DIY urbanism interventions in some instances, but should proceed cautiously.

KEYWORDS:

policy; politics; public health; urban health; urban planning; urbanization

PMID:
26471866
DOI:
10.1177/1757975915602632
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center