Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(2):694-702.

Clinicopathologic Analysis of PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Association with Oncogenic Proteins Status.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy targeting programmed death (PD)-1 or PD-ligand 1 (L1) has shown promising results in renal cell carcinoma (RCC);however, the prognostic implications and clinicopathological features of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in RCC remain unclear.

METHODS:

PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression was immunohistochemically evaluated in 425 resected RCCs of variable histologic subtypes and analyzed according to the clinicopathological status and oncogenic proteins status.

RESULTS:

PD-L1 expression was observed in 9.4 % with no difference between histologic subtypes, but PD-L2 was observed in 49.6 % with highest frequency in papillary RCC (PRCC) (P<0.001). In clear cell RCC (CCRCC), PD-L1 expression was associated with adverse features,including higher nuclear grade, necrosis, sarcomatoid transformation, c-MET expression (all, P<0.001) and VEGF expression (P = 0.002), whereas PD-L2 expression was related with c-MET and VEGF expression (P = 0.008 and P<0.001). In PRCC, positive correlations between PD-L1 and EGFR expression (P = 0.007) or between PDL2 and VEGF expression (P<0.001) were observed. In CCRCC, PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (P<0.001; P = 0.033) and cancer-specific survival (P<0.001; P = 0.010), but not in PRCC.

CONCLUSIONS:

PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression predict poor prognosis in CCRCC. Thus, PD-1/PD-L pathway-targeted immunotherapy may be useful for treatment of patients with CCRCC.

PMID:
26464193
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-015-4903-7
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center