Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 1;189:224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.033. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

Socio-demographic and clinical predictors of treatment resistant depression: A prospective European multicenter study.

Author information

1
Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Carlo Pepoli 5, 40123 Bologna, Italy.
2
INSERM U1061, University of Montpellier, FondaMental Foundation, Montpellier, France.
3
Laboratoire de Psychologie Médicale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, and Centre Européen de Psychologie Médicale-PsyPluriel, Brussels, Belgium.
4
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria.
5
University of London, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
6
Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
7
Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
8
Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Carlo Pepoli 5, 40123 Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: alessandro.serretti@unibo.it.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Few studies investigated socio-demographic and clinical predictors of non response and remission in treatment resistant depression (TRD) in the case of failure of more than two adequate antidepressant (AD) trial. The primary aim of this study was to investigate socio-demographic and clinical predictors of TRD defined as the lack of response to at least three adequate AD treatments, two of which prospectively evaluated. As secondary aims, we also investigated predictors of non response and remission to: (1) at least two adequate AD treatment (one of which prospectively assessed); (2) at least one adequate and retrospectively assessed AD treatment.

METHODS:

In the context of a European multicenter project, 407 major depressive disorder (MDD) patients who failed to respond to a previous AD treatment were recruited for a 2 stage trial, firstly receiving venlafaxine and then escitalopram. MINI, HRSD, MADRS, UKU, CGI-S and CGI-I were administered.

RESULTS:

Ninety eight subjects (27.61%) were considered as resistant to three AD treatments. Clinical predictors were: longer duration and higher severity of the current episode (p=0.004; ES=0.24; p=0.01; RR=1.41, respectively), outpatient status (p=0.04; RR=1.58), higher suicidal risk level (p=0.02; RR=1.49), higher rate of the first/second degree psychiatric antecedents (MDD and others) (p=0.04; RR=1.31, p=0.03; RR=1.32 respectively) and side effects during treatments (p=0.002; RR=2.82). Multivariate analyses underlined the association between TRD and the severity of the current episode (p=0.04). As for secondary outcomes, predicting factors were partially overlapping.

LIMITATIONS:

The limited sample size and specific drugs used limit present findings.

CONCLUSION:

Subjects with a high degree of resistance to AD treatments show specific features which may guide the clinicians to the choice of more appropriate therapies at baseline.

KEYWORDS:

Antidepressant; Depression; Predictors; Remission; Response

PMID:
26451508
DOI:
10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.033
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center