Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Mar;31(3):289-96. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3521-1.

A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of Changes in Quality, Utilization and Cost Following the Colorado Multi-Payer Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot.

Author information

1
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. meredith_rosenthal@harvard.edu.
2
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. meredith_rosenthal@harvard.edu.
3
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
4
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
5
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
6
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
7
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Research on the effects of patient-centered medical homes on quality and cost of care is mixed, so further study is needed to understand how and in what contexts they are effective.

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to evaluate effects of a multi-payer pilot promoting patient-centered medical home implementation in 15 small and medium-sized primary care groups in Colorado.

DESIGN:

We conducted difference-in-difference analyses, comparing changes in utilization, costs, and quality between patients attributed to pilot and non-pilot practices.

PARTICIPANTS:

Approximately 98,000 patients attributed to 15 pilot and 66 comparison practices 2 years before and 3 years after the pilot launch.

MAIN MEASURES:

Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) derived measures of diabetes care, cancer screening, utilization, and costs to payers.

KEY RESULTS:

At the end of two years, we found a statistically significant reduction in emergency department use by 1.4 visits per 1000 member months, or approximately 7.9 % (p = 0.02). At the end of three years, pilot practices sustained this difference with 1.6 fewer emergency department visits per 1000 member months, or a 9.3 % reduction from baseline (p = 0.01). Emergency department costs were lower in the pilot practices after two (13.9 % reduction, p < 0.001) and three years (11.8 % reduction, p = 0.001). After three years, compared to control practices, primary care visits in the pilot practices decreased significantly (1.5 % reduction, p = 0.02). The pilot was associated with increased cervical cancer screening after two (12.5 % increase, p < 0.001) and three years (9.0 % increase, p < 0.001), but lower rates of HbA1c testing in patients with diabetes (0.7 % reduction at three years, p = 0.03) and colon cancer screening (21.1 % and 18.1 % at two and three years, respectively, p < 0.001). For patients with two or more comorbidities, similar patterns of association were found, except that there was also a reduction in ambulatory care sensitive inpatient admissions (10.3 %; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggest that a multi-payer, patient-centered medical home initiative that provides financial and technical support to participating practices can produce sustained reductions in utilization with mixed results on process measures of quality.

KEYWORDS:

health care costs; patient-centered care; primary care redesign; quality improvement

PMID:
26450279
PMCID:
PMC4762834
[Available on 2017-03-01]
DOI:
10.1007/s11606-015-3521-1
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center