Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2016 Mar;24(2):147-56. doi: 10.1002/erv.2411. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

Individualised Versus Standardised Assessment of Quality of Life in Eating Disorders.

Author information

1
Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
2
REDISSEC-Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
3
Center for Biomedical Research in Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Eating Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario Marqués Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain.
4
Eating Disorders Unit, General Hospital of Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain.
5
Department of Psychiatry, Ortuella Mental Health Center, Ortuella, Spain.

Abstract

Individualised measures of quality of life (QoL) refer to instruments that encourage the respondent to actively elicit which areas of their life are most relevant for his/her QoL. The aim of this study is to compare individualised versus standard measures of QoL in a sample of patients with eating disorder (ED). The Schedule for the Evaluation of the Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) and a generic measure of QoL [World Health Organization Brief Quality of Life Assessment Scale (WHOQOL-BREF)] were applied on two occasions (one-year follow-up) to a sample of 165 patients with ED, 57 recovered patients with ED, and 349 women from the general population. The areas of 'family', 'education/career or job', 'friends', 'leisure', 'romantic partner' and 'health' were identified as the most important for their QoL for all groups, both times. The WHOQOL-BREF was more sensitive than the SEIQoL in detecting changes that occurred over time. Clinical interventions for ED should consider social components as objectives of intervention.

KEYWORDS:

SEIQoL; WHOQOL-BREF; eating disorders; quality of life; recovery

PMID:
26442984
DOI:
10.1002/erv.2411
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center