Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nutr Clin Pract. 2016 Feb;31(1):68-79. doi: 10.1177/0884533615601638. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

Enhanced Protein-Energy Provision via the Enteral Route in Critically Ill Patients (PEP uP Protocol): A Review of Evidence.

Author information

1
Department of Nutrition and Dietetic, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
2
Anaesthesiology Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia airini@upm.edu.my.
3
Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Nutrition support is an integral part of care among critically ill patients. However, critically ill patients are commonly underfed, leading to consequences such as increased length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, time on mechanical ventilation, infectious complications, and mortality. Nevertheless, the prevalence of underfeeding has not resolved since the first description of this problem more than 15 years ago. This may be due to the traditional conservative feeding approaches. A novel feeding protocol (the Enhanced Protein-Energy Provision via the Enteral Route Feeding Protocol in Critically Ill Patients [PEP uP] protocol) was proposed and proven to improve feeding adequacy significantly. However, some of the components in the protocol are controversial and subject to debate. This article is a review of the supporting evidences and some of the controversy associated with each component of the PEP uP protocol.

KEYWORDS:

clinical protocols; critical care; critical illness; enteral nutrition; nutritional support

PMID:
26385874
DOI:
10.1177/0884533615601638
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center