Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Sep 5;12:78. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0070-0.

Test-retest reliability of KINARM robot sensorimotor and cognitive assessment: in pediatric ice hockey players.

Author information

1
Department of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. littlec@ucalgary.ca.
2
Department of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. caemery@ucalgary.ca.
3
Department of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. ablack@ucalgary.ca.
4
Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. steve.scott@queensu.ca.
5
Department of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. w.meeuwisse@ucalgary.ca.
6
Departments of Pediatrics & Community Health Sciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. alberto.nettel-aguirre@albertahealthservices.ca.
7
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. bbenson@ucalgary.ca.
8
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. spdukelo@ucalgary.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Better diagnostic and prognostic tools are needed to address issues related to early diagnosis and management of concussion across the continuum of aging but particularly in children and adolescents. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability of robotic technology (KINARM robot) assessments of reaching, position sense, bimanual motor function, visuospatial skills, attention and decision making in youth ice hockey players (ages 10-14).

METHODS:

Thirty-four male children attended two testing days, one week apart. On day one, each subject completed five tasks on the robot with two examiners (alternating examiner sequence); the 2(nd) examiner followed the same procedure as the 1(st) immediately afterwards. One consistent examiner tested subjects one week later. This is a test-retest reliability study. The robotic tasks characterize sensorimotor and/or cognitive performance; 63 parameters from 5 tasks are reported. Session 1 was the 1(st) time the subject performed the 5 tasks, session 2 the 2(nd) time on day 1, and session 3 one week following.

RESULTS:

Intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.06 to 0.91 and 0.09 to 0.90 for session 1 to 2 and 2 to 3, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed agreement in a majority of the parameters and a learning effect in 25 % and 24 % of parameters in session 1 vs 2 and 1 vs 3, respectively but none for session 2 vs 3. Of those that showed a learning effect, only 8 % of parameters in session 1 vs 2 and 10 % in session 1 vs 3 had a clinical relevance measure ≥ 0.8.

CONCLUSIONS:

The relative homogeneity of the sample and the effect of learning seen in some of the task parameters appears to have negatively impacted the intra-class correlation coefficients from session 1 to 2, with less impact for 2 to 3. The Bland-Altman analysis supports good absolute reliability in healthy male children with no neurological impairment ranging in age from 10 to 14. The clinically relevant learning effect seen, in a small number of parameters could be addressed by creating a learning effect adjustment factor and/or implementing a practice session, which would eliminate the learning effect.

PMID:
26341424
PMCID:
PMC4560901
DOI:
10.1186/s12984-015-0070-0
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center