Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Sep 15;49(18):10759-61. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03909. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

Scientific Evidence Supports a Ban on Microbeads.

Author information

1
David H. Smith Conservation Research Program, Society for Conservation Biology , Washington, DC 20001, United States.
2
School of Veterinary Medicine, Aquatic Health Program, University of California Davis , Davis, California 95616, United States.
3
Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis , Davis, California 95616-8627, United States.
4
USGS Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wyoming , Laramie, Wyoming 82071, United States.
5
Department of Environmental Science, Management and Policy, University of California Berkeley , Berkeley, California 94720-3114, United States.
6
Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society , New York 10460-1099, United States.
7
Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
8
Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary , Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, United States.
9
Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Department of Economics, Georgia State University , 33 Gilmer Street SE , Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States.
PMID:
26334581
DOI:
10.1021/acs.est.5b03909
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for American Chemical Society
Loading ...
Support Center