Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):745-53. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13592. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data.

Author information

1
Ministry of Education - Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
2
Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Special Programme of Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
3
ESME - Epidemiological and Statistical Methods Research Group, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
4
Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
5
Brazilian Cochrane Center, São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil.
6
Department of Obstetrics, São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Caesarean section was initially performed to save the lives of the mother and/or her baby. Caesarean section rates have risen substantially worldwide over the past decades. In this study, we set out to compile all available caesarean section rates worldwide at the country level, and to identify the appropriate caesarean section rate at the population level associated with the minimal maternal and neonatal mortality.

DESIGN:

Ecological study using longitudinal data.

SETTING:

Worldwide country-level data.

POPULATION:

A total of 159 countries were included in the analyses, representing 98.0% of global live births (2005).

METHODS:

Nationally representative caesarean section rates from 2000 to 2012 were compiled. We assessed the relationship between caesarean section rates and mortality outcomes, adjusting for socio-economic development by means of human development index (HDI) using fractional polynomial regression models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Maternal mortality ratio and neonatal mortality rate.

RESULTS:

Most countries have experienced increases in caesarean section rate during the study period. In the unadjusted analysis, there was a negative association between caesarean section rates and mortality outcomes for low caesarean section rates, especially among the least developed countries. After adjusting for HDI, this effect was much smaller and was only observed below a caesarean section rate of 5-10%. No important association between the caesarean section rate and maternal and neonatal mortality was observed when the caesarean section rate exceeded 10%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although caesarean section is an effective intervention to save maternal and infant lives, based on the available ecological evidence, caesarean section rates higher than around 10% at the population level are not associated with decreases in maternal and neonatal mortality rates, and thus may not be necessary to achieve the lowest maternal and neonatal mortality.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT:

The caesarean section rate of around 10% may be the optimal rate to achieve the lowest mortality.

KEYWORDS:

Caesarean section rate; maternal mortality; neonatal mortality

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center