Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):829-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392882. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Author information

1
Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia, Porto, Portugal.
2
Department of Digestive Diseases, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
3
Department of Gastroenterology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy.
4
Institute for Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
5
Department of Gastroenterology, National Cancer Institute, Bari, Italy.
6
Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy.
7
University Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Salzburg, Austria.
8
Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
9
Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
10
Department Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Ospedale di Sanremo, Sanremo, Italy.
11
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
12
Institute of Pathology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria.
13
Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
14
Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
15
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy.
16
Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
17
Cliniques universitaires St-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
18
Department of Pathology, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
19
Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital & Imperial College, London, UK.
20
Service d'hépato-gastroenterologie, Hôpital de la Cavale-Blanche, Brest, France.
21
GastroZentrum, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland.
22
Endoscopy Department, Yaroslavl Regional Cancer Hospital, Yaroslavl, Russia.
23
Gedyt Endoscopy Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
24
Department of Gastroenterology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system 1 2 was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS:

1 ESGE recommends endoscopic en bloc resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell cancers (SCCs), excluding those with obvious submucosal involvement (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) may be considered in such lesions when they are smaller than 10 mm if en bloc resection can be assured. However, ESGE recommends endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as the first option, mainly to provide an en bloc resection with accurate pathology staging and to avoid missing important histological features (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 2 ESGE recommends endoscopic resection with a curative intent for visible lesions in Barrett's esophagus (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). ESD has not been shown to be superior to EMR for excision of mucosal cancer, and for that reason EMR should be preferred. ESD may be considered in selected cases, such as lesions larger than 15 mm, poorly lifting tumors, and lesions at risk for submucosal invasion (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 3 ESGE recommends endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric superficial neoplastic lesions that possess a very low risk of lymph node metastasis (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). EMR is an acceptable option for lesions smaller than 10 - 15 mm with a very low probability of advanced histology (Paris 0-IIa). However, ESGE recommends ESD as treatment of choice for most gastric superficial neoplastic lesions (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 4 ESGE states that the majority of colonic and rectal superficial lesions can be effectively removed in a curative way by standard polypectomy and/or by EMR (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). ESD can be considered for removal of colonic and rectal lesions with high suspicion of limited submucosal invasion that is based on two main criteria of depressed morphology and irregular or nongranular surface pattern, particularly if the lesions are larger than 20 mm; or ESD can be considered for colorectal lesions that otherwise cannot be optimally and radically removed by snare-based techniques (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

PMID:
26317585
DOI:
10.1055/s-0034-1392882
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
Loading ...
Support Center