Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;213(6):827.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

Multimodal nociceptive mechanisms underlying chronic pelvic pain.

Author information

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL.
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: ftu@northshore.org.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

We sought to evaluate candidate mechanisms underlying the pelvic floor dysfunction in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and/or painful bladder syndrome (PBS)/interstitial cystitis. Notably, prior studies have not consistently controlled for potential confounding by psychological or anatomical factors.

STUDY DESIGN:

As part of a larger study on pelvic floor pain dysfunction and bladder pain sensitivity, we compared a measure of mechanical pain sensitivity, pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), between women with pelvic pain and pain-free controls. We also assessed a novel pain measure using degree and duration of postexam pain aftersensation, and conducted structural and functional assessments of the pelvic floor to account for any potential confounding. Phenotypic specificity of pelvic floor measures was assessed with receiver operator characteristic curves adjusted for prevalence.

RESULTS:

A total of 23 women with CPP, 23 women with PBS, and 42 pain-free controls completed the study. Women with CPP or PBS exhibited enhanced pain sensitivity with lower PPTs (1.18 [interquartile range, 0.87-1.41] kg/cm(2)) than pain-free participants (1.48 [1.11-1.76] kg/cm(2); P < .001) and prolonged pain aftersensation (3.5 [0-9] vs 0 [0-1] minutes; P < .001). Although genital hiatus (P < .01) was wider in women with CPP there were no consistently observed group differences in pelvic floor anatomy, muscle tone, or strength. The combination of PPTs and aftersensation duration correlated with severity of pelvic floor tenderness (R(2), 41-51; P < .01). Even after adjustment for prevalence, the combined metrics discriminated pain-free controls from women with CPP or PBS (area under the curve, 0.87).

CONCLUSION:

Both experimental assessment of pelvic floor pain thresholds and measurement of sustained pain are independently associated with pelvic pain phenotypes. These findings suggest systematic clinical assessment of the time course of provoked pain symptoms, which occurs over seconds for mechanical pain thresholds vs minutes for aftersensation pain, would be helpful in identifying the fundamental mechanisms of pelvic floor pain. Longitudinal studies of therapies differentially targeting these discrete mechanisms are needed to confirm their clinical significance.

KEYWORDS:

painful bladder syndrome; pelvic pain; pressure pain threshold; quantitative sensory testing

Comment in

PMID:
26299416
PMCID:
PMC4711364
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.038
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center