Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Dec;39(12):1669-78. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.160. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

Little appetite for obesity: meta-analysis of the effects of maternal obesogenic diets on offspring food intake and body mass in rodents.

Author information

1
Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
2
Division of Diabetes and Metabolism, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
3
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
4
Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
5
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
6
Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, and School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
7
Institute of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There is increasing recognition that maternal effects contribute to variation in individual food intake and metabolism. For example, many experimental studies on model animals have reported the effect of a maternal obesogenic diet during pregnancy on the appetite of offspring. However, the consistency of effects and the causes of variation among studies remain poorly understood.

METHODS:

After a systematic search for relevant publications, we selected 53 studies on rats and mice for a meta-analysis. We extracted and analysed data on the differences in food intake and body weight between offspring of dams fed obesogenic diets and dams fed standard diets during gestation. We used meta-regression to study predictors of the strength and direction of the effect sizes.

RESULTS:

We found that experimental offspring tended to eat more than control offspring but this difference was small and not statistically significant (0.198, 95% highest posterior density (HPD)=-0.118-0.627). However, offspring from dams on obesogenic diets were significantly heavier than offspring of control dams (0.591, 95% HPD=0.052-1.056). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant influences of tested predictor variables (for example, use of choice vs no-choice maternal diet, offspring sex) on differences in offspring appetite. Dietary manipulations that extended into lactation had the largest effect on body weight. Subgroup analysis revealed that high protein to non-protein ratio of the maternal diet may promote increased body weight in experimental offspring in comparison with control offspring; low protein content in the maternal chow can have opposite effect.

CONCLUSIONS:

Exposure to maternal obesogenic diets in early life is not likely to result in a substantial change in offspring appetite. Nevertheless, we found an effect on offspring body weight, consistent with permanent alterations of offspring metabolism in response to maternal diet. Additionally, it appears that protein content of the obesogenic diet and timing of manipulation modulate the effects on offspring body weight in later life.

PMID:
26293233
DOI:
10.1038/ijo.2015.160
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center