Stroking or Buzzing? A Comparison of Somatosensory Touch Stimuli Using 7 Tesla fMRI

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 18;10(8):e0134610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134610. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Studying body representations in the brain helps us to understand how we humans relate to our own bodies. The in vivo mapping of the somatosensory cortex, where these representations are found, is greatly facilitated by the high spatial resolution and high sensitivity to brain activation available at ultra-high field. In this study, the use of different stimulus types for somatotopic mapping of the digits at ultra-high field, specifically manual stroking and mechanical stimulation, was compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity of the brain responses. Larger positive responses in digit regions of interest were found for manual stroking than for mechanical stimulation, both in terms of average and maximum t-value and in terms of number of voxels with significant responses to the tactile stimulation. Responses to manual stroking were higher throughout the entire post-central sulcus, but the difference was especially large on its posterior wall, i.e. in Brodmann area 2. During mechanical stimulation, cross-digit responses were more negative than during manual stroking, possibly caused by a faster habituation to the stimulus. These differences indicate that manual stroking is a highly suitable stimulus for fast somatotopic mapping procedures, especially if Brodmann area 2 is of interest.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Brain Mapping
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Male
  • Mechanical Phenomena
  • Physical Stimulation
  • Somatosensory Cortex / physiology*
  • Time Factors
  • Touch Perception*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale (CIBM) of the UNIL [Université de Lausanne], UNIGE [Université de Genève], HUG [Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève], CHUV [Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois], EPFL [École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne], and the Leenaards and Jeantet Foundations. Additional support was received in the form of a Swiss National Science Foundation Project grant to WZ: http://p3.snf.ch/project-153070. The 7T scanner of the Centre d'Imagerie Biomedicale in Lausanne, Switzerland was used for data acquisition: www.cibm.ch. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.