Knowledge informing the prescription and the choice of phosphate binders in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients has a weak evidentiary base. To date, no placebo-controlled trial based on meaningful clinical endpoints (death, cardiovascular events, bone fractures) has been performed to test the efficacy of these drugs. By the same token, we still lack solid proof that noncalcium binders afford better clinical outcomes as compared with calcium-based binders. Without proper trials, clinical decisions about the treatment of hyperphosphatemia rest on experience and contingent clinical judgment. The use of huge doses of calcium-based binders typically prescribed in the nineties now appears unwarranted. The relationship between phosphate and the risk of death is U shaped and moderate hyperphosphatemia carries just a mild-to-moderate risk excess and may not be seen as a compelling indication for the prescription of phosphate binders. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials assessing whether non-calcium and calcium-based binders reduce the risk of death and cardiovascular disease events in ESKD patients remain a public health priority.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.