Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2192-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4459-4. Epub 2015 Aug 15.

Pilot study of a novel pain management strategy: evaluating the impact on patient outcomes.

Author information

1
Colorectal Surgical Associates LLP LTD, Houston, TX, USA. debby_keller@hotmail.com.
2
Colorectal Surgical Associates LLP LTD, Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
3
Colorectal Surgical Associates LLP LTD, Houston, TX, USA.
4
Colorectal Surgical Associates LLP LTD, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery Fellowship, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6560 Fannin, Suite 1404, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a novel multimodal pain management strategy on intraoperative opioid requirements, postoperative pain, narcotic use, and length of stay.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were managed with an experimental protocol. The protocol uses a post-induction, pre-incision bilateral TAP block and local peritoneal infiltration at port sites with long-acting liposomal bupivacaine (20 mL long-acting liposomal bupivacaine, 30 mL 0.25 % bupivacaine, 30 mL saline). Experimental patients were matched on age, body mass index, gender, comorbidity, diagnosis, and procedure to a control group that received no block or local wound infiltration. Both groups followed a standardized enhanced recovery pathway. Demographics, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. The main outcome measures were intraoperative opioids, postoperative pain, opioid use, and length of stay.

RESULTS:

Fifty patients were analyzed-25 experimental and 25 controls. Patients were well matched on all demographics. In both cohorts, the main diagnosis was colorectal cancer and primary procedure performed a segmental resection. Operative times were similar (p = 0.41). Experimental patients received significantly less intraoperative fentanyl (mean 158 mcg experimental vs. 299 mcg control; p < 0.01). The experimental group had significantly lower initial (p < 0.01) and final PACU pain scores (p = 0.04) and shorter LOS (3.0 vs. 4.1 days, p = 0.04) compared to controls. Experimental patients trended toward shorter PACU times and lower opioid use and daily pain scores throughout the hospital stay. Postoperative complication and readmission rates were similar across groups. There were no reoperations or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our multimodal pain management strategy reduced intraoperative opioid administration. Postoperatively, improvements in PACU time, postoperative pain and narcotic use, and lengths of stay were seen in the experimental cohort. With the favorable finding from the pilot study, further investigation is warranted to fully evaluate the impact of this pain management protocol on patient satisfaction, clinical and financial outcomes.

KEYWORDS:

Enhanced recovery after surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Pain; Surgical outcomes

PMID:
26275549
DOI:
10.1007/s00464-015-4459-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center