Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Sep;50:184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Aug 8.

Factor analyses of an Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measurement Instrument (AESMMI).

Author information

1
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: cescoff@sph.emory.edu.
2
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
3
Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, 593 Eddy St., Providence, RI 02903, USA.
4
University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.
5
University of Texas School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin St., Suite 2668, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
6
The Epilepsy Foundation, 8301 Professional Place, Landover, MD 20785-2353, USA.
7
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of an enhanced Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measurement Instrument (AESMMI). An instrument of 113 items, covering 10 a priori self-management domains, was generated through a multiphase process, based on a review of the literature, validated epilepsy and other chronic condition self-management scales and expert input. Reliability and exploratory factor analyses were conducted on data collected from 422 adults with epilepsy. The instrument was reduced to 65 items, converging on 11 factors: Health-care Communication, Coping, Treatment Management, Seizure Tracking, Social Support, Seizure Response, Wellness, Medication Adherence, Safety, Stress Management, and Proactivity. Exploratory factors supported the construct validity for 6 a priori domains, albeit with significant changes in the retained items or in their scope and 3 new factors. One a priori domain was split in 2 subscales pertaining to treatment. The configuration of the 11 factors provides additional insight into epilepsy self-management behaviors. Internal consistency reliability of the 65-item instrument was high (α=.935). Correlations with independent measures of health status, quality of life, depression, seizure severity, and life impact of epilepsy further validated the instrument. This instrument shows potential for use in research and clinical settings and for assessing intervention outcomes and self-management behaviors in adults with epilepsy.

KEYWORDS:

Epilepsy self-management; Instrument; Psychometric testing

PMID:
26264465
DOI:
10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.07.026
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center