Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1134-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.138. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

Characterizing the evolution of perioperative outcomes and costs of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
2
Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. Electronic address: ajm9007@med.cornell.edu.
3
Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study is to characterize the evolution in perioperative outcomes and costs of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) by detailing changes in adjusted outcomes and costs over time.

METHODS:

National Inpatient Sample (2000-2011) data were used to evaluate patient characteristics, outcomes, and perioperative costs for elective EVAR performed for intact AAA. Outcomes were adjusted for patient demographics and comorbidities, and hospital factors by multivariate analysis. Costs were calculated from hospital cost to charge ratio files and adjusted to 2011 dollars.

RESULTS:

From 2000 to 2011, 185,249 patients underwent elective EVAR for intact AAA. The absolute rates of in-hospital major morbidity, mortality, and procedural costs all decreased significantly over time (P < .0001). The prevalence of major comorbidities in patients undergoing EVAR, including obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, all increased significantly over time. After adjusting for multiple demographics, comorbidities, and hospital-level factors, recent outcomes of EVAR (2009-2011) remain superior to the early experience (2000-2002) with respect to mortality and major complications.

CONCLUSIONS:

From 2000-2011, the perioperative outcomes of EVAR improved significantly despite a higher prevalence of comorbidities among patients undergoing repair. Concurrently, procedure-associated costs declined. Advanced technology is often implicated in escalating healthcare spending, and the value of novel techniques is often questioned. These findings highlight that, in the case of EVAR, procedural outcomes have improved while the initial costs of repair have declined over time. EVAR offers an interesting example for stakeholders to consider in the era of cost-containment pressures and criticism of nascent, expensive technology in healthcare.

PMID:
26254455
DOI:
10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.138
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center